When we start to think about virtue we may think
first of obvious heroes, known for their noble deeds. But there are also less
active dimensions of virtue, and they are important resources for living well
the inevitably large parts of our lives in which we are relatively passive or
even helpless.
Let us focus therefore on virtue as it may be
manifested in someone whose hands cannot reach the levers of the world. Think
of someone very aged and infirm, perhaps unable to move her own wheelchair, and
perhaps suffering such memory loss that someone else has to be responsible for
many of the decisions in her life. Such a person, I believe, can still be
virtuous, and even an inspiration to others. She can still be considerate of
those who see her and care for her, and thus need not be altogether without a
decision-making dimension of virtue. But if we see notable virtue in her, much
of it surely will be in her attitudes, and they may be attitudes to things that
she cannot do much about.
Suppose she appreciates whatever good things she is
still able to enjoy, is grateful to those who care for her, is delighted when
she hears someone else’s good news, and never enjoys hearing of another
person’s misfortune. I believe all of that is virtue—not because it shows a
disposition to perform noble deeds, which may be mostly beyond her reach—but
simply because those are ways of being for things that are importantly good.
Hello There. I found your blog using msn. That is an extremely well written article.
ReplyDeleteI'll be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I'll
definitely comeback.
my site :: seal